From a01e9730359ca8ff4886986dffa9f4c3eeb64782 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 01:20:40 +0200 Subject: treewide: clarify the maintainer situation on packages lacking one The status quo is that any Parabola hacker is expected to (be able to) modify any packages, and having a single maintainer of a package discourages that practice as people would typically send a patch to the maintainer instead of pushing it directly. So for a start we can add common maintainership on package lacking any "Maintainer: " header for packages in repositories that are supposed to be maintained. Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli --- pcr/perl-crypt-random-seed/PKGBUILD | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) (limited to 'pcr/perl-crypt-random-seed') diff --git a/pcr/perl-crypt-random-seed/PKGBUILD b/pcr/perl-crypt-random-seed/PKGBUILD index 4fd6aa2b0..2b0d2d68c 100644 --- a/pcr/perl-crypt-random-seed/PKGBUILD +++ b/pcr/perl-crypt-random-seed/PKGBUILD @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ # Contributor (AUR): Daniel Müllner +# Maintainers: Parabola hackers # repolint: reason=asdeps(perl-bytes-random-secure) pkgname=perl-crypt-random-seed -- cgit v1.2.3