From a01e9730359ca8ff4886986dffa9f4c3eeb64782 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 01:20:40 +0200
Subject: treewide: clarify the maintainer situation on packages lacking one

The status quo is that any Parabola hacker is expected to (be able to)
modify any packages, and having a single maintainer of a package
discourages that practice as people would typically send a patch to
the maintainer instead of pushing it directly.

So for a start we can add common maintainership on package lacking any
"Maintainer: " header for packages in repositories that are supposed
to be maintained.

Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
---
 pcr/perl-carp-always/PKGBUILD | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

(limited to 'pcr/perl-carp-always')

diff --git a/pcr/perl-carp-always/PKGBUILD b/pcr/perl-carp-always/PKGBUILD
index 073b5595f..77ee04f9f 100644
--- a/pcr/perl-carp-always/PKGBUILD
+++ b/pcr/perl-carp-always/PKGBUILD
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
 # Contributor (AUR): John D Jones III <j[nospace]n[nospace]b[nospace]e[nospace]k[nospace]1972 -_AT_- the domain name google offers a mail service at ending in dot com>
 # Generator   (AUR): CPANPLUS::Dist::Arch 1.27
+# Maintainers: Parabola hackers <dev@lists.parabola.nu>
+
 
 # parabola changes and rationale:
 #  no changes.
-- 
cgit v1.2.3