From a01e9730359ca8ff4886986dffa9f4c3eeb64782 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 01:20:40 +0200 Subject: treewide: clarify the maintainer situation on packages lacking one The status quo is that any Parabola hacker is expected to (be able to) modify any packages, and having a single maintainer of a package discourages that practice as people would typically send a patch to the maintainer instead of pushing it directly. So for a start we can add common maintainership on package lacking any "Maintainer: " header for packages in repositories that are supposed to be maintained. Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli --- pcr/lg-downloader-git/PKGBUILD | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) (limited to 'pcr/lg-downloader-git/PKGBUILD') diff --git a/pcr/lg-downloader-git/PKGBUILD b/pcr/lg-downloader-git/PKGBUILD index 7dd707c94..7c5fb1363 100644 --- a/pcr/lg-downloader-git/PKGBUILD +++ b/pcr/lg-downloader-git/PKGBUILD @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ # it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by # the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or # (at your option) any later version. +# Maintainers: Parabola hackers pkgname=lg-downloader-git _pkgname=lg-downloader -- cgit v1.2.3