From a01e9730359ca8ff4886986dffa9f4c3eeb64782 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 01:20:40 +0200 Subject: treewide: clarify the maintainer situation on packages lacking one The status quo is that any Parabola hacker is expected to (be able to) modify any packages, and having a single maintainer of a package discourages that practice as people would typically send a patch to the maintainer instead of pushing it directly. So for a start we can add common maintainership on package lacking any "Maintainer: " header for packages in repositories that are supposed to be maintained. Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli --- pcr/gnupg1/PKGBUILD | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) (limited to 'pcr/gnupg1') diff --git a/pcr/gnupg1/PKGBUILD b/pcr/gnupg1/PKGBUILD index a622e8e53..8fe227452 100644 --- a/pcr/gnupg1/PKGBUILD +++ b/pcr/gnupg1/PKGBUILD @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@ # $Id: PKGBUILD 148992 2012-02-05 12:21:23Z andyrtr $ # Contributor (AUR): Andreas Radke # Committer (AUR): Judd Vinet +# Maintainers: Parabola hackers # parabola changes and rationale: # - ignoring test suite failures -- cgit v1.2.3