From a01e9730359ca8ff4886986dffa9f4c3eeb64782 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 01:20:40 +0200 Subject: treewide: clarify the maintainer situation on packages lacking one The status quo is that any Parabola hacker is expected to (be able to) modify any packages, and having a single maintainer of a package discourages that practice as people would typically send a patch to the maintainer instead of pushing it directly. So for a start we can add common maintainership on package lacking any "Maintainer: " header for packages in repositories that are supposed to be maintained. Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli --- nonprism/gnome-online-accounts/PKGBUILD | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) (limited to 'nonprism/gnome-online-accounts') diff --git a/nonprism/gnome-online-accounts/PKGBUILD b/nonprism/gnome-online-accounts/PKGBUILD index da025e7cf..721b8a903 100644 --- a/nonprism/gnome-online-accounts/PKGBUILD +++ b/nonprism/gnome-online-accounts/PKGBUILD @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ # Contributor: Andreas Grapentin # Contributor: Márcio Silva # Contributor: Isaac David +# Maintainers: Parabola hackers # parabola changes and rationale: # - removed support for possibly unsafe protocols -- cgit v1.2.3