summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/pcr/fso-unbootimg
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2022-04-27pcr: fso-unboootimg: relicense under CC0Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
2022-03-31treewide: clarify the maintainer situation on packages lacking oneDenis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
The status quo is that any Parabola hacker is expected to (be able to) modify any packages, and having a single maintainer of a package discourages that practice as people would typically send a patch to the maintainer instead of pushing it directly. So for a start we can add common maintainership on package lacking any "Maintainer: " header for packages in repositories that are supposed to be maintained. Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
2020-03-06pcr: fso-unbootimg: sync with aurDenis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
2020-02-22pcr: fso-unbootimg: makedepends: Add gitDenis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
As the PKGBUILD was only tested with makepkg, and that git was already installed, it didn't pick the issue at build time. Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
2020-02-22pcr: Add fso-unbootimg and start raising licensing issuesDenis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
This adds fso-unbootimg. In archlinux, archlinux32, archlinuxarm, Parabola, and probably other archlinux derivative, the PKGBUILD lack a license. I was told on #archlinux that the PKGBUILDS were copyrightable but at the same time that nobody cared enough about licensing to fix this issue. According to what I was told in this channel, that the only thing to do to move things forward would be to start adding a license to PKGBUILDs to force archlinux to fix its licensing. As I've created this PKGBUILD from scratch, I've included a GPLv3 license as well. I'm also open to relicense it under other free software licenses as well, in order to get this copyright issue fixed. Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>