Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Signed-off-by: David P <megver83@parabola.nu>
|
|
Signed-off-by: David P <megver83@parabola.nu>
|
|
Signed-off-by: David P <megver83@parabola.nu>
|
|
Signed-off-by: David P <megver83@parabola.nu>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
i686 builds with gcc not clang, no need to remove debug flags for it.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Grapentin <andreas@grapentin.org>
|
|
Single previous pref is not enough, effect is seen only with both.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Grapentin <andreas@grapentin.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Andreas Grapentin <andreas@grapentin.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Andreas Grapentin <andreas@grapentin.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Andreas Grapentin <andreas@grapentin.org>
|
|
There are 2k+ files in Firefox source code that contain
'Firefox' (case sensitive). I guess it's not practical to patch them
all that way. Batch search and replace looks like a better approach,
more like in Abrowser from Trisquel.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Grapentin <andreas@grapentin.org>
|
|
Let's stick as close to upstream as possible. I've made these changes
after comparing PKGBUILDs from Arch Linux and Arch Linux ARM. For ARM,
some options like "ac_add_options --enable-hardening" are commented,
and that does not mean they can be replaced by e.g.
"ac_add_options --disable-hardening". Instead, that means these options
are just reset to default values, which can be different now or later.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Grapentin <andreas@grapentin.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Andreas Grapentin <andreas@grapentin.org>
|
|
still on poppler 0.82)
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: Andreas Grapentin <andreas@grapentin.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Andreas Grapentin <andreas@grapentin.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Andreas Grapentin <andreas@grapentin.org>
|
|
- Bump version number, commit, and checksum
- Add Nextcloud.conf to disable built-in updater
- Built and successfully tested on x86_64
- Built on i686
- Build on armv7h failed
Signed-off-by: Andreas Grapentin <andreas@grapentin.org>
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: David P <megver83@parabola.nu>
|
|
Signed-off-by: David P <megver83@parabola.nu>
|
|
Signed-off-by: David P <megver83@parabola.nu>
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: David P <megver83@parabola.nu>
|
|
Signed-off-by: David P <megver83@parabola.nu>
|
|
Signed-off-by: David P <megver83@parabola.nu>
|
|
Signed-off-by: David P <megver83@parabola.nu>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
While meson is used upstream, autools were kept for now,
as converting to meson requires more changes.
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: David P <megver83@parabola.nu>
|
|
Signed-off-by: David P <megver83@parabola.nu>
|
|
Signed-off-by: David P <megver83@parabola.nu>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
|
|
I forgot to git-add the changes. This should fix the
package rename.
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
|
|
Linux-libre and winetricks-libre are project names.
Other packages usually keep the same name than the original
ones.
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
|
|
This doesn't contain any tests yet. Some could be added back by
not deleting them from ob-cache/.
Tests like build-gcc should be OK to bring back as they
only consists in downloading the GCC source code, checking
its checksum, and compiling it. Since GCC is fully free
software and that they use the official releases, it should
be safe to bring them back.
Some other tests are more problematic:
- Some tests like build-linux use source code is not fully
free. This should be removed. Using linux-libre instead
would be possible, but a different test would need to be
written for that.
- Some like xonotic uses official binaries, which is a
problem since we might want not to trust binaries, and we
also don't know how they were built, so we cannot ensure
that they are buildable on FSDG distributions. Again such
tests would need to be removed or forked not to create
problematic test results.
- Some like build-imagemagick download source code from the
phoronix-test-suite website. To use that we would need to
ensure that the released source code is the same than the
one released by the upstream project. If not we could
either remove theses tests or patch the official source
to reproduce an equivalent tarball in a way that can be
more easily reviewed.
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
|
|
The instructions to flash are based on information from uboot's
doc/imx/mkimage/imximage.txt document.
As for the USB Armory which uses an I.MX 53, the it also uses the
same offset as documented in an u-boot installation guide:
https://github.com/inversepath/usbarmory/wiki/Secure-boot-(Mk-I)#user-content-prepare-and-flash-the-signed-u-boot
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: David P <megver83@parabola.nu>
|