summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/libre
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2022-05-06[jami-qt][jami-libclient][jami-daemon]: temporary blacklist replacements ↵bill-auger
(x86_64 only)
2022-05-03[conky]: rebuild with arch bugfixbill-auger
2022-05-03[conky]: upgrade to v1.12.2bill-auger
2022-05-03[conky]: move to librebill-auger
2022-05-03libre: Add java-assertjDenis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
This isn't the latest java-assertj but for now we'll use the 3.8.0 version as it has less dependencies. It also worked fine in Guix so it was less likely to have problematic dependencies. Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
2022-05-02libre: add java-resolver from ArchDenis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
We need java-resolver for building (new versions) of java-xmlgraphics-commons. However Arch Linux removed it, so we need to import it to build it. As for the reason why it was removed in Arch, it's not clear: the last two commits removing it do not really contain any explanations: commit e066cffa541c37d1bca201128bd862118bf0da54 Author: arojas <arojas@eb2447ed-0c53-47e4-bac8-5bc4a241df78> Date: Sat May 8 08:55:46 2021 +0000 Spring '21 cleanup git-svn-id: file:///srv/repos/svn-packages/svn@414619 eb2447ed-0c53-47e4-bac8-5bc4a241df78 commit 880fca2ca92074d126c313338634e2468a20ad0e Author: arojas <arojas@eb2447ed-0c53-47e4-bac8-5bc4a241df78> Date: Sat May 8 08:55:43 2021 +0000 db-remove: java-resolver removed by arojas git-svn-id: file:///srv/repos/svn-packages/svn@414618 eb2447ed-0c53-47e4-bac8-5bc4a241df78 Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
2022-05-02remove java-avalon-frameworkDenis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
The http://excalibur.apache.org/ website has a banner that states on its main page: 2010/12/15 - Apache Excalibur has been retired. For more information, please explore the Attic. Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
2022-05-01[iceweasel]: restore v98 brandingbill-auger
2022-05-01[iceweasel]: tweak for i686bill-auger
2022-04-29[reflector]: upgrade to v2021.11bill-auger
2022-04-29[reflector]: remove ancient provides/conflicts - add parabola pkgrelbill-auger
2022-04-29[your-freedom]: correct checksumbill-auger
2022-04-29[your-freedom]: manual rebuildbill-auger
2022-04-29[kdenlive]: remove packagebill-auger
2022-04-29[kdenlive]: upgrade to v22.04.0bill-auger
2022-04-28[iceweasel]: upgrade to v99.0.1bill-auger
2022-04-28[texlive-bin]: rebuild against latest popplerbill-auger
2022-04-28[your-freedom]: manual rebuildbill-auger
2022-04-28[pacman]: upgrade to v6.0.1bill-auger
also: * added keyring update openrc service file * add dummy.conf empty.conf and the remaining changes were mainly to minimize the diff against arch
2022-04-28[pacman]: revert previous WIP changebill-auger
2022-04-27libre: parabola-vmbootstrap: Add PKGBUILD licenseDenis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Both bill-auger and Andreas Grapentin agreed to license their work in abslibre under the CC0 license. Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
2022-04-27libre: pureos-archive-keyring: clarify provenance in PKGBUILDDenis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
This will avoid futhurer mistakes. The provenance is given by the following commit: commit b352336136d45de172ed012d0871f11dc1ecf672 Author: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org> Date: Thu Oct 25 00:48:43 2018 +0200 Add pureos-archive-keyring This PKGBUILD is based on arch's ubuntu-keyring version 2018.02.28-1.0 Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
2022-04-27libre: pureos-archive-keyring: fix copyright headerDenis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
The provenance is given by the following commit: commit b352336136d45de172ed012d0871f11dc1ecf672 Author: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org> Date: Thu Oct 25 00:48:43 2018 +0200 Add pureos-archive-keyring This PKGBUILD is based on arch's ubuntu-keyring version 2018.02.28-1.0 This reverts commit 0b3346d1338d6ee2c813996897aa53d9c9e641e6. (libre: pureos-archive-keyring: Add copyright header). Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
2022-04-27libre: pureos-archive-keyring: Add copyright headerDenis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
2022-04-24Move nvramtool from libre to PCRDenis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Despite what its name suggest, the PCR repository is not only for PKGBUILDs that come from AUR. In the Parabola wiki[1], there is the criteria for packages meant to go in PCR, and we can deduce from what is written there that PCR is for packages that both: * "are not included on official repos of Arch Linux"[1] * "are not considered to be essential enough for the base system."[1] So here even if the nvramtool PKGBUILD doesn't come from AUR, it is meant to go in PCR. [1]https://wiki.parabola.nu/Repositories#.5Bpcr.5D Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
2022-04-23[archlinux32-keyring]: rebuildbill-auger
2022-04-23[pacman]: documentation for previous changebill-auger
2022-04-22[pacman]: bugfix previous changebill-auger
2022-04-22[pacman]: allow pacstrap to create cross-arch chrootsbill-auger
2022-04-20updpkg: libre/kdevelop 21.12.3-1.parabola1David P
Signed-off-by: David P <megver83@parabola.nu>
2022-04-20[linux-libre-api-headers]: upgrade to v5.17.3bill-auger
2022-04-20[linux-libre]: upgrade to v5.17.3 (x86_64 only)bill-auger
2022-04-19libre: add nvramtoolDenis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
2022-04-14[parabola-hackers]: upgrade to v20210719bill-auger
2022-04-12[qutebrowser]: upgrade to v2.5.0bill-auger
2022-04-12[pacman]: remove ancient provides/conflictsbill-auger
this 'pacman' package replaced 'pacman-parabola' in 2014, when pacman was at major ver 4 - it is extremely unlikely that anyone would attempt upgrading a system that old, or that it would be successful 9d87540a9f774ae8a808d1a3bb6d9b112277accd i would suggest as a rule of thumb, to place _some_ reasonable limit on backward-compatibilty (eg: 5 years, or 2 pacman major versions) it has been 8 years and we are at pacman 6 now - it is safe to declare 'pacman-parabola' as irrelevant/obsolete
2022-04-12[nmap]: remove packagebill-auger
2022-04-12[your-freedom]: correct checksumbill-auger
2022-04-12housekeeping - remove mentions of qt5-webengine from pkgdescbill-auger
2022-04-12[iceweasel]: i686 still FTBSbill-auger
2022-04-11libre/iceweasel: Update to 99.0 according to upstream changesgrizzlyuser
2022-04-11libre/iceweasel: Update existing and add new patchgrizzlyuser
1. Code has been moved from bookmarks.html.in to another file, see [1] 2. Code from region.properties has been moved as well, see [2] 3. Mozilla added yet another page for promotion of their products, this time it's in Preferences, and is called "More from Mozilla", which contains QR code and a feature to send a link to email, which lead to Firefox Mobile, which is not compatible with the FSDG. So the page has been removed. [1] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1749435 [2] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1733497
2022-04-11libre/iceweasel: Sync with upstream 98.0.1grizzlyuser
2022-04-06libre: linux-libre-64: Update to 5.15.12 by syncing with linux-libreDenis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
2022-04-06libre: remove uboot-sunxiDenis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
The uboot-sunxi PKGBUILD is completely unmaintained and it has long been replaced by the uboo4extlinux-sunxi PKGBUILD. All the devices that were supported by uboot-sunxi are now supported by the uboo4extlinux-sunxi PKGBUILD. Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
2022-04-05[your-freedom]: manual rebuildbill-auger
2022-04-03[your-freedom]: manual rebuildbill-auger
2022-03-31treewide: Maintainer: GNUtoo: clarify the maintainer situationDenis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
The status quo is that any Parabola hacker is expected to (be able to) modify any packages, and having a single maintainer of a package discourages that practice as people would typically send a patch to the maintainer instead of pushing it directly. So for a start we can add common maintainership on package lacking any "Maintainer: " header for packages in repositories that are supposed to be maintained. As for finding who worked on a given package (in case it could be needed), the git log should have all the information. Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
2022-03-31treewide: clarify the maintainer situation on packages lacking oneDenis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
The status quo is that any Parabola hacker is expected to (be able to) modify any packages, and having a single maintainer of a package discourages that practice as people would typically send a patch to the maintainer instead of pushing it directly. So for a start we can add common maintainership on package lacking any "Maintainer: " header for packages in repositories that are supposed to be maintained. Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
2022-03-26[qt5-styleplugins]: rebuild (i686) against latest qt-basebill-auger