Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Signed-off-by: David P <megver83@parabola.nu>
|
|
Signed-off-by: David P <megver83@parabola.nu>
|
|
Signed-off-by: David P <megver83@parabola.nu>
|
|
Signed-off-by: David P <megver83@parabola.nu>
|
|
Signed-off-by: David P <megver83@parabola.nu>
|
|
Signed-off-by: David P <megver83@parabola.nu>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: David P <megver83@parabola.nu>
|
|
|
|
- Compiling a toolchain takes time.
- We also need to make sure to get the toolchain right, usually it
requires 3 steps (gcc-initial, gcc-intermediate, gcc-final) and
here we're trying to do it in two to save compilation time.
- The 2 step toolchain worked for newlib but we don't know PKGBUILD
examples that do that for glibc based toolchains.
- We don't need a libc to build Linux.
Because of all that, we depends on the aarch64 gcc-initial toolchain
for building it now.
Once we have pushed aarch64 gcc, we will need to add it again as
a dependency for building this pacakge, in order to be able to build
this package and aarch64 userspace applications as well with the same
compiler.
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
|
|
|
|
about a conflict with "same package in another repository".
|
|
|
|
Using more recent gcc resulted in many different build failures
and I didn't have the time to investigate and fix them all.
Both PKGBUILDs now build with makepkg.
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
|
|
|
|
this is the last arch package to support webkit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: David P <megver83@parabola.nu>
|
|
Signed-off-by: David P <megver83@parabola.nu>
|
|
Signed-off-by: David P <megver83@parabola.nu>
|
|
Signed-off-by: David P <megver83@parabola.nu>
|
|
Signed-off-by: David P <megver83@parabola.nu>
|
|
Signed-off-by: David P <megver83@parabola.nu>
|
|
Signed-off-by: David P <megver83@parabola.nu>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: David P <megver83@parabola.nu>
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: David P <megver83@parabola.nu>
|
|
Signed-off-by: David P <megver83@parabola.nu>
|
|
Signed-off-by: David P <megver83@parabola.nu>
|
|
this version of pacman needed to be built
by its own version of makepkg
in order to avoid the silent strip failure
and produce debug packages
|
|
Given that:
- The build works fine with makepkg and the tests do pass.
- The checks fail with libremakepkg
- On previous version the checks did fail because the maximum
path length was reached.
The checks are disabled for now to be albe to package it.
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The patch below updates [libre/nextcloud-client] to the newest version
2.6.2.
The changelog is included in the patch.
Tested on x86_64, successfully built on i686. The arm build failes on my
arm chroot, but it is possible, that it compiles on others (such as the
one in beefcake) as discussed with Freemor on IRC.
The function to register with a provider (Account -> Add new -> register
with a provider) fails for unknown reasons. However one can regiter over
this website: https://nextcloud.com/providers/
I have not found any other problems.
From d7d978ab13b21b66f99f0ed6f0b2a86ceb212c03 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Theo von Arx <theova@member.fsf.org>
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2019 12:56:54 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Update [libre/nextcloud-client] to v2.6.2
- Bump pkgver, _commit and pkgrel
- Enable tests for i686 and armv7h since they succeed
- Add patch nextcloud-client-FS64630.diff (as Arch does)
- Update remove_qtwebengine.patch
- Format PKGBUILD closer to Arch's one
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
|
|
Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org> schrieb am Sat, 21. Dec 19 17:02:
>On Fri, 20 Dec 2019 13:47:22 +0100
>theova <theova@bluewin.ch> wrote:
>> gnome-boxes has buttons to download and install non-free GNU/Linux
>> distributions (as in previous versions). It is not possible to do
>> that, e message "unsupported protocol https" pops up. Thus I'm not
>> sure if this is a freedom issue?
>Ideally it would be better to fix the issue. Users (me included) are
>probably not expecting such buttons in the first place.
>
>Is your PKGBUILD fixing it in prepare() ? or does it still need to be
>fixed in a subsequent patch?
Here is a new patch to face this issue.
As only non-free OS are downloadable through the download functionality,
I decided to hide the download button completely.
Working on x86_64 as expected, i686 and armv7h build fine.
From: Theo von Arx <theova@member.fsf.org>
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2020 10:57:50 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [libre/gnome-boxes] Hide download button
- Add a patch to hide the download button as only nonfree OS can be downloaded
- Add rationale
- Bump pkrel
- Remove recommendation of nonfree OS
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
|