summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2022-04-28[fonts-meta]: removed dropped font packagesbill-auger
2022-04-28[libre-testing/iceweasel]: deletebill-auger
2022-04-28[iceweasel]: upgrade to v99.0.1bill-auger
2022-04-28[texlive-bin]: rebuild against latest popplerbill-auger
2022-04-28[your-freedom]: manual rebuildbill-auger
2022-04-28[pacman]: upgrade to v6.0.1bill-auger
also: * added keyring update openrc service file * add dummy.conf empty.conf and the remaining changes were mainly to minimize the diff against arch
2022-04-28[pacman]: revert previous WIP changebill-auger
2022-04-28[libre-testing/pacman]: deletebill-auger
2022-04-28[gmid]: add description to openrc service filebill-auger
2022-04-28COPYRIGHTS: clarify licenses more, and add license for new contributionsDenis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
- If new contributions are under CC0 we don't need to state that people also agreed to use CC0 for new contributions. - Before, I forgot to use git commit -a --amend before pushing, so PKGBUILDs went in instead of packages. I'm using packages to enable to add scripts (for instance scripts to check the licenses of the PKGBUILDs) under other licenses. In addition many packages have more files (like .install files for instance) than just PKGBUILDs and patches, and the other packages files are also under the CC0 license. Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
2022-04-27Add file documenting copyrightsDenis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
2022-04-27libre: parabola-vmbootstrap: Add PKGBUILD licenseDenis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Both bill-auger and Andreas Grapentin agreed to license their work in abslibre under the CC0 license. Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
2022-04-27libre: your-sanity: Add PKGBUILD licenseDenis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Freemor agreed to use the CC0 licenses for all the ebuilds made by pers[1]. [1] On the 27 April 2021 on #parabola on liberachat we have: 02:31 < Freemor> re: PKGBUILD license - I'm fine with both the CC) and the README Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
2022-04-27libre-testing: barebox: relicense under CC0Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
2022-04-27pcr: fso-unboootimg: relicense under CC0Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
2022-04-27pcr: omap-usb-boot: relicense under CC0Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
2022-04-27pcr: omap-u-boot-utils-git: add maintainersDenis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
2022-04-27pcr: omap-u-boot-utils-git: relicense under CC0Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
2022-04-27pcr: lg-downloader-git: relicense under CC0Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
2022-04-27pcr: qdl: relicense under CC0Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
2022-04-27pcr: imx_usb_loader-git: relicense under CC0Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
2022-04-27pcr: guix-installer: relicense under CC0Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
2022-04-27pcr: simtrace2: relicense under CC0Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
2022-04-27pcr: fomu-verilog-blink: relicense under CC0Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
2022-04-27pcr: simtrace: relicense under CC0Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
2022-04-27pcr: python-bundlewrap: relicense as CC0Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
2022-04-27libre: pureos-archive-keyring: clarify provenance in PKGBUILDDenis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
This will avoid futhurer mistakes. The provenance is given by the following commit: commit b352336136d45de172ed012d0871f11dc1ecf672 Author: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org> Date: Thu Oct 25 00:48:43 2018 +0200 Add pureos-archive-keyring This PKGBUILD is based on arch's ubuntu-keyring version 2018.02.28-1.0 Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
2022-04-27libre: pureos-archive-keyring: fix copyright headerDenis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
The provenance is given by the following commit: commit b352336136d45de172ed012d0871f11dc1ecf672 Author: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org> Date: Thu Oct 25 00:48:43 2018 +0200 Add pureos-archive-keyring This PKGBUILD is based on arch's ubuntu-keyring version 2018.02.28-1.0 This reverts commit 0b3346d1338d6ee2c813996897aa53d9c9e641e6. (libre: pureos-archive-keyring: Add copyright header). Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
2022-04-27libre: pureos-archive-keyring: Add copyright headerDenis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
2022-04-27pcr: remove log4j-1.2Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
The 1.2 version of log4j is not only unmaintained / End of life, but it also has lot of security vulnerabilities[1] including at least one critical CVE, 4 high CVEs and 1 moderate CVE. [1]https://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/ Link: https://labs.parabola.nu/issues/3261 Reported-by: gap Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
2022-04-24Move nvramtool from libre to PCRDenis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Despite what its name suggest, the PCR repository is not only for PKGBUILDs that come from AUR. In the Parabola wiki[1], there is the criteria for packages meant to go in PCR, and we can deduce from what is written there that PCR is for packages that both: * "are not included on official repos of Arch Linux"[1] * "are not considered to be essential enough for the base system."[1] So here even if the nvramtool PKGBUILD doesn't come from AUR, it is meant to go in PCR. [1]https://wiki.parabola.nu/Repositories#.5Bpcr.5D Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
2022-04-23[archlinux32-keyring]: rebuildbill-auger
2022-04-23[pacman]: documentation for previous changebill-auger
2022-04-22[pacman]: bugfix previous changebill-auger
2022-04-22[pacman]: allow pacstrap to create cross-arch chrootsbill-auger
2022-04-20updpkg: libre/kdevelop 21.12.3-1.parabola1David P
Signed-off-by: David P <megver83@parabola.nu>
2022-04-20[linux-libre-api-headers]: upgrade to v5.17.3bill-auger
2022-04-20[linux-libre]: upgrade to v5.17.3 (x86_64 only)bill-auger
2022-04-19libre: add nvramtoolDenis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
2022-04-19Import the CC0 1.0 licenseDenis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Hyperbola also imported that license in their core repository and Eli Schwartz uses the Unlicense for pers PKGBUILDs, so using compatible licenses would enable more code sharing between various distributions using PKGBUILDs. In addition several contributors consider many of the PKGBUILDs not to be copyrightable (because they are very simple). Note that just adding a license without any clear statements associated with it brings some legal uncertainty. From the GPL howto[1]: "If a program has a copy of a license FOO alongside the source files, but doesn't have an explicit statement that “This program is released under license FOO,” that leaves room for uncertainty about whether the license FOO applies to the code of that program." so it's better to add statements somewhere to use that license. [1]https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-howto.html Link: https://labs.parabola.nu/issues/2862 Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
2022-04-14[parabola-hackers]: upgrade to v20210719bill-auger
2022-04-14[qtau][sinsy][sekai][hts_engine_api-git]: bugfix PKGBUILDSbill-auger
2022-04-13Remove the min package and the nonfree directoryDenis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
The min package depends on electron, and since it's a web browser, and that electron is unlikely to be fixed any time soon as fixing it would require substancial work, it's safe to remove it. Link: https://labs.parabola.nu/issues/3227 Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
2022-04-13aur: armv7h: add dosfstoolsDenis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
2022-04-12[qutebrowser]: upgrade to v2.5.0bill-auger
2022-04-12[gmid]: add packagebill-auger
2022-04-12[coreboot-util]: add package (i686 FTBS)bill-auger
2022-04-12[phc-intel]: add packagebill-auger
2022-04-12[pacman]: remove ancient provides/conflictsbill-auger
this 'pacman' package replaced 'pacman-parabola' in 2014, when pacman was at major ver 4 - it is extremely unlikely that anyone would attempt upgrading a system that old, or that it would be successful 9d87540a9f774ae8a808d1a3bb6d9b112277accd i would suggest as a rule of thumb, to place _some_ reasonable limit on backward-compatibilty (eg: 5 years, or 2 pacman major versions) it has been 8 years and we are at pacman 6 now - it is safe to declare 'pacman-parabola' as irrelevant/obsolete
2022-04-12[nmap]: remove packagebill-auger
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.39.1) at 2024-11-26 02:14:58 +0000