diff options
author | bill-auger <mr.j.spam.me@gmail.com> | 2020-10-17 18:36:11 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | bill-auger <mr.j.spam.me@gmail.com> | 2020-10-21 23:11:11 -0400 |
commit | 96904734e943290416b016076b107bf46540ebe7 (patch) | |
tree | a1caef08afb40fccb5a3f66bfba1a454b75ad697 /libre/ruby/PKGBUILD | |
parent | fcbc7ad6e43184a907f0db1ca235ea92cff4b0bf (diff) | |
download | abslibre-96904734e943290416b016076b107bf46540ebe7.tar.gz abslibre-96904734e943290416b016076b107bf46540ebe7.tar.bz2 abslibre-96904734e943290416b016076b107bf46540ebe7.zip |
[virt-manager]: package 'virt-manager'
the changes in this patch are more extensive
than what the commit message would suggest
they are predominantly for the sake of
minimizing the diff with upstream
this is a split package upstream; but only 'virt-install' is on the blacklist
originally, the package_virt-manager() function was deleted
and the package_virt-install() function was left in tact,
including the code that splits the output files into two packages
that made this PKGBUILD quite confusing:
* the pkgbase and abslibre directory are named 'virt-manager'
* the PKGBUILD is still formatted as a split package,
which happens to output only one single package
* some non-package files are stashed aside, for apparently no reason,
rather than making the intention obvious by deleting them
all of the work necessary to output the 'virt-manager' package,
is necessarily done by this PKGBUILD while building 'virt-install'
(the package_virt-manager() function is merely a `mv` statement);
so there is no reason not to package both
packaging 'virt-manager' also has the benefit, of the pinned
'virt-install' dependency of 'virt-manager', being always satisfiable
been added to the blacklist with reason: 'technical'
virt-manager has been added to the blacklist with reason: 'technical'
Diffstat (limited to 'libre/ruby/PKGBUILD')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions