diff options
author | Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org> | 2020-02-08 16:18:44 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org> | 2020-02-08 16:35:38 +0100 |
commit | 889d759a4d3eb96e4ab0c12c5391480905304e09 (patch) | |
tree | dd621eb0225716f4597edac57eb9a7cb263e5873 /libre/parabola-artwork | |
parent | fc18dd0bbb82847bbe07215951b998480c11dc42 (diff) | |
download | abslibre-889d759a4d3eb96e4ab0c12c5391480905304e09.tar.gz abslibre-889d759a4d3eb96e4ab0c12c5391480905304e09.tar.bz2 abslibre-889d759a4d3eb96e4ab0c12c5391480905304e09.zip |
libre: Add phoronix-test-suite-libre
This doesn't contain any tests yet. Some could be added back by
not deleting them from ob-cache/.
Tests like build-gcc should be OK to bring back as they
only consists in downloading the GCC source code, checking
its checksum, and compiling it. Since GCC is fully free
software and that they use the official releases, it should
be safe to bring them back.
Some other tests are more problematic:
- Some tests like build-linux use source code is not fully
free. This should be removed. Using linux-libre instead
would be possible, but a different test would need to be
written for that.
- Some like xonotic uses official binaries, which is a
problem since we might want not to trust binaries, and we
also don't know how they were built, so we cannot ensure
that they are buildable on FSDG distributions. Again such
tests would need to be removed or forked not to create
problematic test results.
- Some like build-imagemagick download source code from the
phoronix-test-suite website. To use that we would need to
ensure that the released source code is the same than the
one released by the upstream project. If not we could
either remove theses tests or patch the official source
to reproduce an equivalent tarball in a way that can be
more easily reviewed.
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'libre/parabola-artwork')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions