treewide: clarify the maintainer situation on packages lacking one

The status quo is that any Parabola hacker is expected to (be able to)
modify any packages, and having a single maintainer of a package
discourages that practice as people would typically send a patch to
the maintainer instead of pushing it directly.

So for a start we can add common maintainership on package lacking any
"Maintainer: " header for packages in repositories that are supposed
to be maintained.

Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions