summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/libre-testing/uboot4grub-udoo/0002-kernel-add-support-for-gcc-5.patch
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDenis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>2021-12-12 22:45:00 +0100
committerDenis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>2021-12-12 22:45:32 +0100
commit49fef4a963e1b2163a000a6b65e2f4d61bd171ae (patch)
tree89dcc01ec578373123b9ab188e9a3342df2a0772 /libre-testing/uboot4grub-udoo/0002-kernel-add-support-for-gcc-5.patch
parenta95b393e7d22b42eb2d82b550f9995975ab33299 (diff)
downloadabslibre-49fef4a963e1b2163a000a6b65e2f4d61bd171ae.tar.gz
abslibre-49fef4a963e1b2163a000a6b65e2f4d61bd171ae.tar.bz2
abslibre-49fef4a963e1b2163a000a6b65e2f4d61bd171ae.zip
libre-testing: remove outdated u-boot packages
All these u-boot pakcages were consolidated in SOC specific packages instead of board specific pakcages in libre. In addition the libre packages are more recent and in sync with the Parabola armv7h installation manual. Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'libre-testing/uboot4grub-udoo/0002-kernel-add-support-for-gcc-5.patch')
-rw-r--r--libre-testing/uboot4grub-udoo/0002-kernel-add-support-for-gcc-5.patch97
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 97 deletions
diff --git a/libre-testing/uboot4grub-udoo/0002-kernel-add-support-for-gcc-5.patch b/libre-testing/uboot4grub-udoo/0002-kernel-add-support-for-gcc-5.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index 30718c561..000000000
--- a/libre-testing/uboot4grub-udoo/0002-kernel-add-support-for-gcc-5.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,97 +0,0 @@
-From 5b07fc2c680ad4279a45d863108544020b4d74cd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
-Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 15:51:05 -0700
-Subject: [PATCH 2/6] kernel: add support for gcc 5
-
-We're missing include/linux/compiler-gcc5.h which is required now
-because gcc branched off to v5 in trunk.
-
-Just copy the relevant bits out of include/linux/compiler-gcc4.h,
-no new code is added as of now.
-
-This fixes a build error when using gcc 5.
-
-Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
-Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
-Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
-Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
----
- include/linux/compiler-gcc5.h | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
- 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+)
- create mode 100644 include/linux/compiler-gcc5.h
-
-diff --git a/include/linux/compiler-gcc5.h b/include/linux/compiler-gcc5.h
-new file mode 100644
-index 0000000..cdd1cc2
---- /dev/null
-+++ b/include/linux/compiler-gcc5.h
-@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
-+#ifndef __LINUX_COMPILER_H
-+#error "Please don't include <linux/compiler-gcc5.h> directly, include <linux/compiler.h> instead."
-+#endif
-+
-+#define __used __attribute__((__used__))
-+#define __must_check __attribute__((warn_unused_result))
-+#define __compiler_offsetof(a, b) __builtin_offsetof(a, b)
-+
-+/* Mark functions as cold. gcc will assume any path leading to a call
-+ to them will be unlikely. This means a lot of manual unlikely()s
-+ are unnecessary now for any paths leading to the usual suspects
-+ like BUG(), printk(), panic() etc. [but let's keep them for now for
-+ older compilers]
-+
-+ Early snapshots of gcc 4.3 don't support this and we can't detect this
-+ in the preprocessor, but we can live with this because they're unreleased.
-+ Maketime probing would be overkill here.
-+
-+ gcc also has a __attribute__((__hot__)) to move hot functions into
-+ a special section, but I don't see any sense in this right now in
-+ the kernel context */
-+#define __cold __attribute__((__cold__))
-+
-+#define __UNIQUE_ID(prefix) __PASTE(__PASTE(__UNIQUE_ID_, prefix), __COUNTER__)
-+
-+#ifndef __CHECKER__
-+# define __compiletime_warning(message) __attribute__((warning(message)))
-+# define __compiletime_error(message) __attribute__((error(message)))
-+#endif /* __CHECKER__ */
-+
-+/*
-+ * Mark a position in code as unreachable. This can be used to
-+ * suppress control flow warnings after asm blocks that transfer
-+ * control elsewhere.
-+ *
-+ * Early snapshots of gcc 4.5 don't support this and we can't detect
-+ * this in the preprocessor, but we can live with this because they're
-+ * unreleased. Really, we need to have autoconf for the kernel.
-+ */
-+#define unreachable() __builtin_unreachable()
-+
-+/* Mark a function definition as prohibited from being cloned. */
-+#define __noclone __attribute__((__noclone__))
-+
-+/*
-+ * Tell the optimizer that something else uses this function or variable.
-+ */
-+#define __visible __attribute__((externally_visible))
-+
-+/*
-+ * GCC 'asm goto' miscompiles certain code sequences:
-+ *
-+ * http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58670
-+ *
-+ * Work it around via a compiler barrier quirk suggested by Jakub Jelinek.
-+ * Fixed in GCC 4.8.2 and later versions.
-+ *
-+ * (asm goto is automatically volatile - the naming reflects this.)
-+ */
-+#define asm_volatile_goto(x...) do { asm goto(x); asm (""); } while (0)
-+
-+#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_USE_BUILTIN_BSWAP
-+#define __HAVE_BUILTIN_BSWAP32__
-+#define __HAVE_BUILTIN_BSWAP64__
-+#define __HAVE_BUILTIN_BSWAP16__
-+#endif /* CONFIG_ARCH_USE_BUILTIN_BSWAP */
---
-2.4.4
-